Cox v. State of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
Plaintiff landowners appeal from a summary judgment granted defendant State of California in an inverse condemnation action.
The Pleadings
The charging allegations of plaintiffs’ complaint are broadly drafted. They allege that, for a period prior to December 22, 1964, defendant “participated in the planning, designing, construction, maintenance, and operation of a flood control project on the Feather River in Butte County,” and that on or about that date, as a proximate result of defendant’s said activities, “waters from the Feather River were diverted from natural drainage by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Gantner v. GantnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brown v. BleibergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Conn v. National Can CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Zeilman v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Slovensky v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Hooks v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.