Legal Opinion

Cox v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1970No. Civ. 11949PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JANES, J.

Plaintiff landowners appeal from a summary judgment granted defendant State of California in an inverse condemnation action.

The Pleadings

The charging allegations of plaintiffs’ complaint are broadly drafted. They allege that, for a period prior to December 22, 1964, defendant “participated in the planning, designing, construction, maintenance, and operation of a flood control project on the Feather River in Butte County,” and that on or about that date, as a proximate result of defendant’s said activities, “waters from the Feather River were diverted from natural drainage by…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Gantner v. GantnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brown v. BleibergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Conn v. National Can CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Zeilman v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Slovensky v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Hooks v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API