Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1998No. 66107-3PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

We are asked in this case to determine whether the petitioner, the City of Seattle (City), falls within the scope of RCW 19.28.120(1), a statute that requires an electrical contractor’s license for non-utility electrical work. We hold that the City is an “entity” subject to that statute, and, thus, affirm the Court of Appeals.

FACTS

The relevant facts in this case are few and not in dispute. The City operates the Seattle Conservation Corps (SCC) through its Department of Housing and Human Services. The SCC prepares “unemployed, homeless adults for transition to full-time employment with…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API