Legal Opinion

Borrell v. Continental Casualty Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1983No. 2307PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

On October 14, 1977, appellee, William Borrell (Borrell) was involved in a two vehicle accident while operating a motor vehicle owned by his employer, Lukens Steel Company. Borrell was engaged on company business at the time of the accident. The other vehicle involved was owned by the Orthliep Company and operated by an employee of that company. The Lukens vehicle was insured by Continental Casualty Company (Continental). The Orthliep vehicle was insured by Commercial Union Assurance Company (Commercial Union). Borrell was not insured. He did not own a motor vehicle.

Borrell…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wagner v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Schimmelbusch v. Royal-Globe InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Motley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Augostine v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Adams v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Hall v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. State v. Kassey Benjamin(076612)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  4. Bell v. United States Dept. of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Mumma v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API