Legal Opinion

Schimmelbusch v. Royal-Globe Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1977No. 1767PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

The appellee was an uninsured driver of an uninsured car who suffered serious injuries in an automobile collision with a car owned by County Hauling, Inc. and insured by appellant insurance company. The accident occurred on August 7,1975, and was within the grace period allowed for procurement of no-fault insurance under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, 40 P.S. 1009.101 et seq.

Appellee has instituted an action in assumpsit against appellant insurance company charging that it is responsible for the payment of the benefits to an injured party which are…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Tyler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. FalliganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Balderrama v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API