Legal Opinion
Bell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 30, 1985No. Nos. 83-1223, 83-1269PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the district court erred in its dismissal of certain defendants for lack of jurisdiction, and in its construction of various statutory provisions of the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, No. 176, §§ 101 et seq., Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 40, §§ 1009.101 et seq. (Purdon Supp.1984) (“No-Fault Act”). We affirm.
*4931.
The facts in this case are not in dispute and have been agreed upon by stipulation. On July 22, 1981, appellant, Warner Bell (“Bell”), a Pennsylvania resident, was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Commonwealth v. Sitkin's Junk Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- United States v. LorenzettiSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Donald Hoagland, as Receiver of Midwest Transit, Inc. v. Sandberg, Phoenix & Von Gontard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Jordan v. Kent Recovery Services, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- In Re Monroe Well Service, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- In Re Rheam of Indiana, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- In Re Tel-Central Communications, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.