Legal Opinion

Augostine v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1981No. 97PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the lower court’s order granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of the defendant, Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (hereinafter Penn National) and against the plaintiff, who is the defendant’s insured.

The following facts are not disputed. The plaintiff who was employed by Penn Road Materials Company was injured while alighting from one of his employer’s trucks in the course of his employment. He applied for and is currently receiving total disability benefits under the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.1 At the time of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wagner v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Turner v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Gradler v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Adams v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Supp v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Motley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Hall v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Borrell v. Continental Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Boothman v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API