Legal Opinion

Estate of Ince

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1929No. Docket No. 6411PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

This is an appeal from an order vacating a previous order allowing a broker’s commission for sale of estate property, and fixing anew the amount of commission due to respondent. Such motion to vacate was made under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure and was based upon the ground that the first order was made and taken against respondent through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise and excusable neglect.

Appellants contend that the superior court had no jurisdiction to entertain respondent’s motion to vacate or to vacate its previous order for the reasons :

1. Respondent is not a party…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eastwood v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harada v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Tesluck v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Efird v. C. H. Antrim Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API