Legal Opinion

Tesluck v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1935No. Civ. 9629PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

There are two appeals arising out of the facts of this case. The first is one from an order denying petitioner the right to be made a party to a proceeding fix ing the amount of a real estate broker’s commission and to set aside an order for the payment of the same. The second is from an order made in the superior court, sitting in law and equity, dismissing the complaint of appellant brought to recover the commission. The appeals have been consolidated.

The facts show that the executor of the estate of Margaret M. Hughes, deceased, was desirous of selling certain real property belonging to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Eastwood v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Estate of InceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of De BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Bartsas Realty, Inc. v. LevertonNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Estate of SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Efird v. C. H. Antrim Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Estate of CattaliniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API