Legal Opinion

United States v. Lafayette, Shechem

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 1, 2003No. 01-3067 & 01-3099PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.

GARLAND, Circuit Judge:

In Apprendi v. New Jersey, the Supreme Court held that, “[ojther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 2362-63, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Appellant Shechem Lafayette, who was convicted of multiple narcotics and firearms charges, contends that the 292-month sentence he received on one count of possession with intent to distribute 50…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. United States v. Freddie J. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Pettigrew, CraigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Garcia-TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Lopesierra-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API