United States v. Lafayette, Shechem
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
In Apprendi v. New Jersey, the Supreme Court held that, “[ojther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 2362-63, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Appellant Shechem Lafayette, who was convicted of multiple narcotics and firearms charges, contends that the 292-month sentence he received on one count of possession with intent to distribute 50…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- United States v. Freddie J. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Pettigrew, CraigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Garcia-TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lopesierra-GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.