United States v. Pettigrew, Craig
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Craig Pettigrew contends that his 1997 drug convictions and sentence are unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because a judge rather than a jury determined the quantity of drugs involved in his crimes. Pettigrew, however, failed to raise this claim at trial or on direct appeal. As a consequence, we may not consider Pettigrew’s challenge on collateral review unless he shows “cause and prejudice” sufficient to overcome his procedural default. We…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- United States v. MoulingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- United States v. Donzell McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
- State v. FeblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- United States v. BookerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.