Legal Opinion

United States v. Pettigrew, Craig

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 21, 2003No. 02-3033PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.

GARLAND, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Craig Pettigrew contends that his 1997 drug convictions and sentence are unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because a judge rather than a jury determined the quantity of drugs involved in his crimes. Pettigrew, however, failed to raise this claim at trial or on direct appeal. As a consequence, we may not consider Pettigrew’s challenge on collateral review unless he shows “cause and prejudice” sufficient to overcome his procedural default. We…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. United States v. MoulingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  3. United States v. Donzell McKinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  4. State v. FeblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. United States v. BookerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API