Legal Opinion

Goel v. Heller

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 15, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-5046PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARRY, District Judge.

Introduction

Plaintiffs, Anant B. Goel and his wife Zarina, 1 bring this action against individual defendants Steven B. Heller and James J. Edgette, and the investment firm of Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Company and two related companies, First Century Company and First Century Partnership II (the “Smith Barney group”), alleging, in essence, three causes of action; fraud, civil RICO, and “indemnification.” Heller and Edgette, together, and the Smith Barney group, now move to dismiss, or in the alternative for summary judgment. Because the court will rely upon…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Deaton v. BurneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Greenberg v. Potomac Health Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Keller v. Blinder (In Re Blinder, Robinson & Co.)District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
  4. Lewison Bros. v. Washington Savings Bank (In Re Lewison Bros.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  5. Davenport v. CasteenDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API