Legal Opinion
Deaton v. Burney
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 15, 1995No. 15133PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gkady, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment dismissing the claims for relief they brought pursuant to R.C. 2933.32(D)(3) for allegedly illegal strip searches and/or searches of their bodily cavities performed while they were prisoners of the Dayton Human Rehabilitation Center (“DHRC”), a detention facility operated by the city of Dayton. The defendants are employees of the city. Some or all of them are alleged to have conducted the searches. The city of Dayton is not a party to the action.
The searches took place on March 24,1989, when the plaintiffs were brought to the DHRC…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
- LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re: Daniel Fordu, Debtor. Harold A. Corzin v. Julie A. ForduCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re Robert N. Jones and Margaret N. Jones, Debtors, Philip F. Boberschmidt, Trustee v. Society National Bank, N/k/a Key BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Newman v. Univ. of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Price v. Carter Lumber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.