United States v. De Villamil
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Meats which arrived at the port of San Juan, P. R., on May 11, 1921, and which were duly entered for consumption on the 26th of May, 1921, were assessed for duty by the collector of customs at 25 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 14 of the *256emergency tariff act which, paragraph, in so far as pertinent reads as follows:
Par. 14. Fresh or frozen beef, veal, mutton, lamb, and pork, 2 cents per pound. Meats of all kinds,- prepared or preserved, not specially provided for herein, 25 per centum ad valorem. ■
The importer protested that the merchandise was imported and entered for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hartranft v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- M. H. Pulaski Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. Cronkhite Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. E. L. Goodsell Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Excel Shipping Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Cargill Grain Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Cargill Grain Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.