Legal Opinion
Gilmer v. Hunt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 23, 1934No. 20998PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The plaintiff in error instituted an action in the district court of Beckham county, Okla., against the defendant in error to recover a money judgment for an amount due under a verbal contract. He filed, or caused to be filed in the action, a garnishment affidavit and procured the issuance out of the office of the court clerk of that court of a number of garnishment summonses. The defendant filed a motion and an amended motion to dissolve the garnishments in so far as they pertained to the salary due to him from C. If. Anthony & Company, a corporation, earned within the 90 days immediately…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. Grady CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Oklahoma Light & Power Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Pitts v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Dies v. Bank of Commerce of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Wallace v. GassawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Alex v. Southland Production Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Musick v. State Ex Rel. MilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Willhite v. WillhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Cornhuskers Theatres, Inc. v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Ex parte HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.