In Re the Termination of the Parental Rights of Tanghe
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The district court terminated Amy Tanghe’s parental rights for failure to correct conditions that resulted in her children’s placement outside the home. Because the district court did not address the children’s best interests in the original or amended order, we remand for findings on whether termination is in the children’s best interests.
FACTS
Amy Tanghe is the mother of three children, ages six, four, and two years. In April 2002 Lincoln, Lyon, and Murray Human Services (collectively, “the county”) filed a children in need of protection or services (CHIPS) petition on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Matter of Welfare of JMSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Marriage of Maxfield v. MaxfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re the Welfare of P.R.L.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re the Welfare of the Child of D.L.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. A. P., Parent.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.