In Re the Welfare of the Child of D.L.D.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
In these consolidated appeals, appellant-parents challenge the district court’s termination of their parental rights, arguing that they rebutted the statutory presumption that they are palpably unfit and that the district court erred by failing to make findings regarding the child’s best interests. Because the district court did not err by concluding that appellant-parents failed to rebut the statutory presumption of palpable unfitness, we affirm in part. But because the district court failed to make findings regarding the statutory best-interests criterion, we remand for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re the Welfare of J.J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Welfare of J.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. S. R. and M. J. I., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: F. F. N. M., ParentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: F. F. N. M., ParentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.