Legal Opinion
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 27, 2011No. Nos. A11-354, A11-355PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Appellants challenge the district court’s orders allowing J.L.L. to withdraw her consent to voluntary termination of parental rights and denying a petition to terminate J.L.L.’s parental rights to K.L.L. Appellants argue that the district court erred by allowing J.L.L. to withdraw her consent and in concluding that (1) J.L.L. rebutted the statutory presumption of palpable unfitness, (2) the county failed to show that J.L.L. is a palpably unfit parent, and (3) it was in KL.L.’s best interests not to terminate J.L.L.’s parental rights. We affirm.
FACTS
On April 30, 2010,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Heidbreder v. CartonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re the Welfare of K.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Welfare of J.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A.N.T. and J.W., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S. H. and X. L. H., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014