Legal Opinion

J. W. Kelly & Co. v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1910PublishedCited by 35 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from the Criminal Court of Hamilton County . S. E. MuReynolds, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lansden

The plaintiff in error, a corporation, was indicted in the criminal court of Hamilton county for that it “did *522unlawfully sell as a beverage in wholesale quantities spirituous, vinous, malt, alcoholic, and intoxicating- liquor within four miles of a school house where a school was kept,” and, upon trial, was convicted, and a fine of $50 was as^ssed against it, from which it has appealed to this ,. ourt.

Tn the court below plaintiff in error moved to quash the indictment upon the following grounds:

“ (1) Because there is no law in this State which forbids or makes unlawful the sale of liquors or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State ex rel. Bond v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Pitts v. Nashville Baseball ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Palmer v. Southern Express Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State v. Cumberland ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API