Legal Opinion

Aune v. Oregon Trunk Railway

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1935PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an action to recover the damage resulting from the burning of a warehouse and blacksmith shop in Bend. The defendants demurred to the amended complaint upon the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. The trial court sustained the demurrer and, upon plaintiff’s refusal to plead further, dismissed the action from which judgment the plaintiff has appealed.

The complaint alleges that on August 14, 1933, the defendant, Oregon Trunk Railway, switched certain empty box cars on to a spur leading to plaintiff’s warehouse and left them alongside of the warehouse without locking the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Pittsburgh Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Deisenrieter v. Kraus-Merkel Malting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. WeldonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Musgrave Et Ux. v. Lucas Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. B. W. King, Inc. v. Town of West New YorkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API