Legal Opinion
State v. Hladun
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 7, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
234 N.J. Super. 518 (1989)
560 A.2d 1348
STATE OF NEW JERSEY,
v.
GEORGE M. HLADUN, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Somerset County.
Decided March 7, 1989.
Veronica Galante Nolan, Assistant Prosecutor, Somerset County Prosecutor's Office for the State of New Jersey.
John R. DeCicco, Jr., for the defendant, George M. Hladun.
ARNOLD, P.J.Cv.
The defendant moved to suppress evidence seized from his car during a warrantless search. The State sought to justify the search as a consent search on the basis that the defendant had signed a form (Appendix A) stating that he consented to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CancelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- State v. SpeidNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- State v. DominickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996