Legal Opinion
State v. Speid
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 7, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
255 N.J. Super. 398 (1992)
605 A.2d 297
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SEAN SPEID AND APRIL ALEXANDER, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Hudson County.
Decided February 7, 1992.
Gerard Breland, Asst. Prosecutor for the State.
Robert J. Desmond, for Defendant, Sean Speid.
Abrams & Wofsy (Arthur J. Abrams, Esq.) for Defendant, April Alexander.
DE STEFANO, J.S.C.
When the police have probable cause, they may lawfully enter a home, conduct a protective sweep and secure the premises in anticipation of obtaining a search warrant. If the police thereafter obtain a consent to search,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Denise Brown v. State of New Jersey (076656) (Cumberland County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- State v. DominickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Denise Brown v. State of New Jersey (076656) (Cumberland County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Denise Brown v. State of New Jersey (076656) (Cumberland County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017