Legal Opinion
Bristol v. Milano
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 1, 1998No. File No. CV970572222SPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This proceeding is an appeal from the assessment of damages by condemnation that has come to the court on the wrong procedural tracks, to which it had been directed by the court clerk on instruction from the civil court manager of the court operations division. As the initial result of this misdirection, the title of this action is the reverse of what it should be. It is to this procedural gaffe that the court must first direct its attention.
On April 14, 1997, the Bristol city council, under the authority of Special Acts 1996, No. 96-12, granting municipal corporations the right to purchase…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Karp v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Budney v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Commissioner of Transportation v. Connemara CourtConnecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Town of Newington v. Estate of YoungConnecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Commissioner of Trans. v. SheaConnecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Housing Authority of Hartford v. Charter Oak Terrace/Rice Heights Health Center, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.