Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1910No. Civ. No. 854PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of Kings County. John G. Covert, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This application as presented is based upon the theory, first, that cities organized under the municipal corporations act are not subordinate to general law with reference to municipal affairs; and, second, that the general municipal corporations act, which by its terms confers jurisdiction upon the city councils of the respective cities organized thereunder to hear and determine election contests, is the exclusive jurisdiction in that regard. With neither of-these provisions do we agree.

Our supreme court in Ex parte Helm, 143 Cal. 556, [77 Pac. 453], has construed section 6 of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte HelmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Funeral Dirs. Ass'n. v. Bd. of Funeral Dirs. & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Klose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Matter of Application of ShoemakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. McGregor v. Bd. of Trs. of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API