Wagner-Taylor Co. v. Spinelli
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Simpson,
This suit is by an insurance broker against a firm, which was one of its customers, to recover the balance due on a running account. All the issues of fact, raised by the pleadings and supported by the evidence, were submitted by the trial judge to the jury, in a charge so perspicuous that it was impossible for them to have misunderstood it. He told them that the evidence did not disclose any defense to $376.49 of plaintiff’s claim, and that “there is no challenge of the account in any particular, except as to” the sum of $791.13, growing out of plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hunter v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- First Nat'l Bank of N.J. v. Cattie Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Clapp v. HuntSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sidle v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Campdon v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Toll v. BeckermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Statler v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Perlman v. Pittsburgh Cabinets & Builders Supplies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959