First Nat'l Bank of N.J. v. Cattie Bros.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
In its statement of the question involved in this case, the only point plaintiff asks us to determine, is whether “a new trial [should] be granted if the jury unreasonably disregards the evidence and finds for the defendant.” In its assignment of error raising this question, it sets forth eight reasons why this should have been granted by the court below. Four of these are the usual general ones; three relate to matters of evidence, in two of which exceptions were taken; and one relates to the i'efusal of a point for charge, to which also an exception was taken.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Second National Bank v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Maloy v. Rosenbaum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Putnam v. Ensign Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Scheer v. MelvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Leadenham's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Koch v. ImhofSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- O'Farrell v. MawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Dupont v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Penneys v. SegalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.