Campdon v. Continental Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
This appeal is from a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff, in an action on one of defendant’s life insurance policies. As none of the assignments of error can be sustained, the judgment must be affirmed.
The first assignment avers that the court below erred in overruling defendant’s motion “for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v.,” because the verdict was against the law, the evidence and the weight of the evidence, and because there was error in refusing defendant’s first and second points for charge, neither being quoted in the assignment, which is,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- March v. Philadelphia & West Chester Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Suravitz v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Commonwealth v. GreevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Suravitz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Livingood v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Brandwene Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Gerfin v. Colonial Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Elinor M. Ratay v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Wagner v. Somerset County Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.