Legal Opinion
Factor Oil Co. v. Brydia
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 24, 1938No. 28279PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURST. ,T.
This is an action to recover the reasonable rental value of certain oil well casing. Defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was sustained, and judgment. was entered dismissing the case. Plaintiff appeals. The controversy involves the following facts:
The Royalty Oil Refining Company mortgaged certain property, including the casing in question, to one G. J. Morton, trustee for the bondholders of the Royalty Oil Refining Company. Morton, as trustee, sued to recover judgment against the company and to foreclose the mortgage. While this action was pending, and on or about February…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Alfrey v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Baker v. VadderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Cox v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Thomas v. First Nat. Bank of TecumsehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lemons v. LemonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Feightner v. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Dierks v. WalshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.