Legal Opinion
Feightner v. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 4, 2003No. 95,207PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.
¶ 1 Plaintiff/appellant, Mary Norman Feightner sued defendant/appellee, Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. (BOK) for unpaid overtime and unpaid loan origination commissions. Two issues are before us. One, did the trial judge correctly give summary judgment to BOK on the overtime claim as barred by claim (res judicata) and/or issue (collateral estoppel) preclusion as having been previously litigated in an adjudicative administrative proceeding had before the Oklahoma Department of Labor (DOL) under 40 O.S.2001, § 165.7 that resulted in a final order adverse to Ms. Feightner and in favor of BOK? 1 Two, did…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Sheffer v. Carolina Forge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Harmon v. CradduckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Wilson v. State ex rel. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.