Legal Opinion

Division of Aid v. Hogan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1944No. 29737PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

As stated by the plaintiff in its brief, the only question involved in this case is wheth er the estate of Mrs. Arnold is liable under Section 1359-1 et seq., General Code, for the financial aid furnished her husband during his lifetime, regardless of whether she entered into a contractual obligation to repay the same.

Section 1359-7, General Code (119 Ohio Laws, 238, 241), effective August 14, 1941, relied on by the plaintiff, reads as follows:

“Upon the death of a person, the total amount of aid paid to said person and to his or her spouse under this act, shall be a preferred claim against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. People Ex Rel. Heydenreich v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  4. County Department of Public Welfare v. PotthoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  5. City of Worcester v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moore v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Newland v. ChildIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Allen v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Williams v. ShapiroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
  5. State Department of Social Welfare v. DyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API