Legal Opinion
Doll v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 25, 2000No. CIV.A. 97-4186PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOCHBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Lester Doll, (“Doll”) a former employee of defendant Port Authority Trans Hudson Corporation (“PATH”), filed a complaint on August 18, 1997, alleging that his discharge by PATH in January, 1996:(i) discriminated against him on the basis of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623; (ii) constituted wrongful termination and breach of contract under New Jersey law; and (iii) negligently inflicted emotional distress upon him. 1 PATH brings the instant mo tion for summary judgment, which will be granted…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Luongo v. Village Supermarket, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Bell v. KA Industrial Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- GAMBRELL v. SOUTH BRUNSWICK BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- HONAUER v. NORTH JERSEY TRUCK CENTERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- In re Safety-Kleen Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008