Legal Opinion
Bell v. KA Industrial Services, LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 25, 2008No. Civil Action 08-cv-2410PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge:
This matter appears before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief can be Granted, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons sets forth below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part the Motion.
I
The following facts are alleged in the Amended Complaint. Defendant, KA Industrial Services, LLC, (“KA”) employed Plaintiff, Jay Bell, III, (“Bell”) as a backhoe operator/laborer beginning in September 2006. 1 (Amend.ComplA 3.) On March 3, 2007, Bell was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dennis v. County of Atlantic CountyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Andrew Jackson v. Amazon.com Services LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- HOY v. HOYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- MINEGAR v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES INCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- POWELL v. ADVANCING OPPORTUNITIESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.