Legal Opinion

McNeiley v. Ayres Jewelry Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1993No. 92-256PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Chief Justice.

Appellants Cheri McNeiley and Donald Smith (the consignors) brought claims of negligence and breach of contract against Appellees Ayres Jewelry Co. (the consignee) and Charles Ayres after Ms. McNeiley’s ring had been stolen from the consignee’s store. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the consignee and Mr. Ayres.

We reverse and remand.

The consignors present the following issues:

I. Was summary judgment against the appellants proper under Rule 56, W.R.C.P.?

II. Should summary judgment have been granted in favor of the appellants and against [the] appellees…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Meuse-Rhine-Ijssel Cattle Breeders of Canada Ltd. v. Y-Tex Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cliff & Co., Ltd. v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Davidson v. ShermanWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kelliher v. HermanWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Treemont, Inc. v. HawleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McNeiley v. Ayres Jewelry Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Idaho Migrant Council, Inc. v. WarilaWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Snelling v. RomanWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Samuel v. ZwerinWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API