State v. Elofson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis, Dickinson, J., of selling milk without a license from the city health commissioner, in’violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis. From an order denying a motion for a new trial defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This appeal involves the validity of one of the ordinances of the city of Minneapolis. This ordinance provides for the issuance of licenses to venders of milk within the city limits, and, as a condition precedent to the securing of licenses as venders, that the *104animals producing the milk to be sold must be inspected. Such as are located within the county of Hennepin are to be inspected under the direction and supervision of the city health commissioner, free of charge. If the animals from which the applicant for the license obtains his milk are located outside of Hennepin county, they must be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Barber v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- City of St. Paul v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006