Legal Opinion

Holland Reformed School Society v. DeLazier

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 18, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin, V. C.

The bill in this cause was filed to charge the defendants with a deficiency ascertained in a foreclosure suit. To the bill the *443defendant, DeLazier, demurs, substantially on five grounds— first, that the court was without jurisdiction; second, that the remedy of the complainant is at law; third, that the complainant has no right to call upon the defendant, Jacob DeLazier, concerning the subject-matter of the suit; fourth, that the complainant has no right to the relief that it prays for, and fifth, that there is no privity between the complainant and the defendant, Jacob DeLazier.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Black Diamond, C., Newark v. RedlinghouseNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Wootton v. PollockNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Clott v. JordanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API