Legal Opinion

Black Diamond, C., Newark v. Redlinghouse

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 17, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant brings its bill against Jacob Redlinghouse, Herman C. Roemer, William G. Graef and Frances Graef, his wife, for a deficiency arising out of a foreclosure and sale of the premises mentioned in the complaint. The Graefs failing to answer, decree pro confesso was entered against them.

The facts are stipulated as follows: Redlinghouse and Roemer, March 4th, 1929, executed a bond and mortgage for $17,000 to complainant. July 17th, 1930, the defendant Redlinghouse conveyed his interest to William G. Graef and Frances Graef, his wife. The deed contained a provision whereby the Graefs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Green v. StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  2. Nat. Bank of N.J. v. LefkowitsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Holland Reformed School Society v. DeLazierNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. ManzaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  2. Fid. Union Trust v. Prudent Invest.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  3. Wootton v. PollockNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API