Beeson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
COBB, Special Judge.
Appellant was convicted of seduction and has appealed. The facts developed on trial and objections and exceptions urged and taken are fully indicated in the treatment of the case to follow. »
1. The court charged upon accomplice testimony, as follows: “You are further instructed that under the law and facts of this case, prosecutrix, Miss Edna Blackshear is an accomplice; and before the State can secure a conviction it must corroborate her testimony by evidence other than her own tending to prove a promise of marriage made to her by defendant, by which he seduced and had…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Newman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Borrer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.