Legal Opinion

Barrett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1909No. 4533PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

RAMSEY, Judge.

The appellant was convicted in the court below on a charge of incest and his punishment' assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two- years. The prosecuting witness, Mrs. Lee Watson (nee Lee Barrett) testified to facts which, if true, would have made appellant guilty beyond doubt. A number of questions are raised and grounds urged why this judgment of conviction should be reversed.

1. Among other things, it is urged that the indictment is insufficient, in that it is not alleged distinctly and unequivocally that appellant and prosecutrix were not legally married; nor is it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Beeson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Baggett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API