Legal Opinion
Herbst v. Able
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 26, 1968No. Nos. 66 Civ. 3216, 66 Civ. 3382, 66 Civ. 3471, 66 Civ. 3536, 66 Civ. 3589, 66 Civ. 3658, 66 Civ. 3706, 66 Civ. 3775, 66 Civ. 3859, 66 Civ. 3885, 66 Civ. 3997, 66 Civ. 4194, 66 Civ. 4363, 67 Civ. 348PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
On April 15, 1968, pursuant to the order of Sugarman, C. J., these 14 cases were assigned to this judge for all purposes. General Rule 2, of the Rules of this Court.
On May 10, 1968, the court met with counsel for all parties. On that date, the court set June 21, 1968, as the date for all plaintiffs to file motions on the question whether these cases should be class actions.
Of the 14 cases, 11 are denominated class actions; Simon and the two Selzer cases are not. Plaintiffs in Herbst, Beecher, Levy and Gottesman sought to have their cases declared class actions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Kronenberg v. Hotel Governor Clinton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- MacAlister v. GutermaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Berger v. Purolator Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- National Nut Co. of California v. Susu Nut Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Freedman v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Herbst v. AbleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Berman v. Narragansett Racing Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1969
- Epstein v. WeissDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- Clark v. Cameron-Brown Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.