Legal Opinion

TV Fanfare Publications, Inc. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1999No. 98-1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

A. Exhibited Advertisements

As to the placards in the ADCART promotions and the signs in the Market Information Center promotions, Fanfare concedes that it should have collected the tax on the production charges. It claims, however, that the remainder of the charges was for providing advertising space and not taxable under Ohio Adm. Code 5703-9-41. The commissioner contends that this rule requires Fanfare to collect tax on the entire amount charged the advertisers.

R.C. 5741.02(A) levies an excise tax “on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property or the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Emery Industries, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Drackett Products Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Albright v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Watchmakers-Clockmakers Institute, Inc. v. TracyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. TV Fanfare Publications, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API