Legal Opinion
Hoery v. United States
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 24, 2003No. 02SA241PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
I. INTRODUCTION
In this case, we agreed to answer two certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit regarding continuing trespass and nuisance under Colorado law. Pursuant to C.A.R. 21.1, the Tenth Circuit certified the following state law questions pertinent to an appeal pending in that court:(1) Does the continued migration of toxic chemicals from defendant’s property to plaintiffs property, allegedly caused by chemical releases by the defendant, constitute continuing trespass and/or nuisance under Colorado law?(2) Does the ongoing presence of those toxic…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Kronisch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Anthony J. Nieman v. Nlo, Inc. And Nl Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Van WykSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Gerrity Oil & Gas Corp. v. MagnessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Taygeta Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Christian v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
- Forest Lakes Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. United Land Corp. of Am.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.