Legal Opinion
Kernochan v. . N.Y.E.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 1, 1891PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This case and several others now awaiting decision present the question whether the owner of premises in the city of New York, who, after the construction of the elevated railroad in the street upon which the premises abutted, leased them for a term of years, can maintain an action for damages for the impairment of easements in the street appurtenant to his premises, by the existence and maintenance of the road, suffered during the period in which the premises…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Francis v. . SchoellkopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- McGean v. . Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by47 opinions
- Roberts v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Fries v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- New York State Energy Research & Development Authority v. Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- Miller v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Foote v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.