Legal Opinion
J. C. Peacock, Inc. v. Hasko
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 1960No. Civ. 23615PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from a minute order (filed April 11, 1958) which was entered April 15, 1958, denying a motion of certain defendants to discharge a writ of attachment and an alias writ of attachment.
A résumé of the proceedings is as follows:
Prior to January 14, 1953, the J. 0. Peacock Machine Company was a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California.
On January 14, 1953, an agreement of merger between J. C. Peacock, Inc., and J. C. Peacock Machine Company, corporations, together with certificates of each of said corporations, was filed with the Secretary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. All American Bus Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Crossman v. Vivienda Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- United States v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Schulze v. SchulzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Asher v. Pacific Power and Light CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1965
- Gaillard v. Natomas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Greb v. Diamond International Corp.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Riley v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.