Pickens v. Hal J. Copeland Grocery Co.

FOSTER, X

So far as we are aware, the extent to which this court has gone to justify a suit resembling in any respect that of the nature of the one shown on this appeal' is to hold that an action will lie for damages on account of an interference with one’s •trade or profession under certain circumstances (Sparks v. McCreary, 156 Ala. 382, 47 So. 332, 22 L. R. A. [N. S.] 1224), and for damages by one due to the conduct of another in causing him to be discharged from bis employment under the circumstances stated (U. S. F. & G. Co. v. Millonas, 206 Ala. 147, 89 So. 732, 29 A. L. R. 520; T. C. I.…