Scholle v. Home Mutual Casualty Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
The collision between the automobile and. the bridge occurred in the state of Kansas, and the rights and liabilities of all persons arising therefrom are governed by the laws of that state. Buckeye v. Buckeye, 203 Wis. 248, 234 N. W. 342; Garlin v. Garlin, 260 Wis. 187, 50 N. W. (2d) 373; Fyksen v. Fyksen, 267 Wis. 542, 66 N. W. (2d) 150.
The defendant contends that the substantive law in Kansas, with respect to tort actions by one spouse against the other, was determined in the case of Sink v. Sink, 172 Kan. 217, 239 Pac. (2d) 933. That decision was filed on January 26, 1952, and determined…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buckeye v. BuckeyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Sink v. SinkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Garlin v. GarlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Fyksen v. FyksenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by4 opinions
- Haumschild v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
- Gridley v. CardenasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Hansen v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956