Legal Opinion

Scholle v. Home Mutual Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The collision between the automobile and. the bridge occurred in the state of Kansas, and the rights and liabilities of all persons arising therefrom are governed by the laws of that state. Buckeye v. Buckeye, 203 Wis. 248, 234 N. W. 342; Garlin v. Garlin, 260 Wis. 187, 50 N. W. (2d) 373; Fyksen v. Fyksen, 267 Wis. 542, 66 N. W. (2d) 150.

The defendant contends that the substantive law in Kansas, with respect to tort actions by one spouse against the other, was determined in the case of Sink v. Sink, 172 Kan. 217, 239 Pac. (2d) 933. That decision was filed on January 26, 1952, and determined…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buckeye v. BuckeyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Sink v. SinkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  3. Garlin v. GarlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Fyksen v. FyksenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haumschild v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1958
  3. Gridley v. CardenasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hansen v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API