Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Hansen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
The law governing the creation and extent of tort liability is that of the state where the tort was committed. Buckeye v. Buckeye, 203 Wis. 248, 234 N. W. 342; Forbes v. Forbes, 226 Wis. 477, 277 N. W. 112; Nelson v. American Employers’ Ins. Co. 258 Wis. 252, 45 N. W. (2d) 681; Garlin v. Garlin, 260 Wis. 187, 50 N. W. (2d) 373; Fyksen v. Fyksen, 267 Wis. 542, 66 N. W. (2d) 150; Scholle v. Home Mut. Casualty Co. 273 Wis. 387, 78 N. W. (2d) 902.
In the case of Rogers v. Rogers, 265 Mo. 200, 177 S. W. 382, the supreme court of Missouri held that the state statutes enabling the wife to sue and be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- Willott v. WillottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Buckeye v. BuckeyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Forbes v. ForbesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Nelson v. American Employers' InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Haumschild v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Robinson v. GainesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Harper v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Windauer v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Oehler v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.