Gridley v. Cardenas
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.
The sole question in each case is whether the complaint states a cause of action. The accident having occurred in Florida, the rights of the parties are governed by the law of that state. Scholle v. Home Mut. Casualty Co. 273 Wis. 387, 389, 78 N. W. (2d) 902.
The complaints allege only a want of ordinary care on the part of the pilot, Cardenas, as contrasted with gross negligence or wilful and wanton misconduct. Defendant contends, therefore, that the asserted cause of action is barred by Florida’s guest statute, sec. 320.59, Fla. Stats. 1953, the presently pertinent provisions of which are as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Koger v. HollahanSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Peavey v. City of Miami Magic City Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Kasanof v. Embry-Riddle Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Fishback v. YaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Snorek v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Joye N. Pierson, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Douglas J. Pierson, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- In re WollerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- Marr v. American Flyers Airline CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Newberger v. PokrassWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.