Haumschild v. Continental Casualty Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
This appeal presents a conflict-of-laws problem with respect to interspousal liability for tort growing out of an automobile accident. Which law controls, that of the state of the forum, the state of the place of wrong, or the state of domicile? Wisconsin is both the state of the forum and of the domicile while California is the state where the alleged wrong was committed. Under Wisconsin law a wife may sue her husband in tort. Under California law she cannot. Peters v. Peters (1909), 156 Cal. 32, 103 Pac. 219; Cubbison v. Cubbison (1946), 73 Cal. App. (2d) 437, 166 Pac. (2d) 387; and Paulus…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Peters v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Coster v. CosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Poling v. PolingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Kennedy v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.