Legal Opinion

Beresford v. Starkey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1991No. 32S01-9104-CV-323PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

The trial court instructed the jury in this case that appellants Daniel and Debra Beresford were licensees on the land of Richard and Janet Starkey and thus entitled only to protection against wanton and willful conduct. We hold that the Beres-fords were invitees and thus entitled to reasonable care.

On September 20, 1991, the Starkeys hosted a party for a group of friends at their cottage on Lake Maxinkuckee. Dan-ie! and Debra Beresford were two of the guests they invited to the party. Late in the evening, the Starkeys and some of their guests decided to take a swim in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burrell v. MeadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Beresford v. StarkeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wendt v. KerkhofIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (" Mtbe")District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. Columbian Rope Co. v. ToddIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Sand Creek Partners, L.P. v. FinchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Bateman v. Central Foundry Division, General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API