Legal Opinion

Columbian Rope Co. v. Todd

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1994No. 05A04-9301-CV-11PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendant-Appellant Columbian Rope Company (Columbian) appeals a judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Vernon C. Todd (Todd). We affirm.

ISSUES

Columbian raises the following restated issues:

1. whether the trial court erred in allowing Todd's expert to testify regarding the adequacy of Columbian's product warnings;

2. whether the trial court erred in admitting rope samples into evidence; and

3. whether the trial court erred in denying Columbian's Ind.Trial Rule 50(A) motion at the close of Todd's case-in-chief.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In May, 1985, Todd, an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Nally v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. American Optical Co. v. WeidenhamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Carman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. BlaylockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rizzuto v. Davidson Ladders, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Lockhart v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. RungeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Hernandez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Flynn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API