Homa v. Wilkes-Barre Transit Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Musmanno,
Mrs. Helen Homa was injured when she slipped on an icy pavement at a point other than a regular car stop, deposited there' by the operator of the bus on which she had been a passenger. She and her husband brought a suit in trespass against the. Wilkes-Barre Transit Corporation, owner of the bus, but at the trial they were nonsuited. The court en banc affirmed the nonsuit And the plaintiff appealed.
A nonsuit is one of the most drastic. procedures in the civil branch ‘of the law, bringing, as it does, a lawsuit to an abrupt termination, and thus depriving the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stevens v. Reading Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Coyne v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Brown v. Beaver Valley Motor Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Gourlay Et Ux v. P.R.T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Zanko v. SemmelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tyler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Hallbauer v. ZARFOSSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Walker v. PORT AUTH. OF ALLEGHENY CTY.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Morrell v. Lane Aviation Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
- Nieman v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.