Legal Opinion

Homa v. Wilkes-Barre Transit Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1959No. Appeals, 262 and 263PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Musmanno,

Mrs. Helen Homa was injured when she slipped on an icy pavement at a point other than a regular car stop, deposited there' by the operator of the bus on which she had been a passenger. She and her husband brought a suit in trespass against the. Wilkes-Barre Transit Corporation, owner of the bus, but at the trial they were nonsuited. The court en banc affirmed the nonsuit And the plaintiff appealed.

A nonsuit is one of the most drastic. procedures in the civil branch ‘of the law, bringing, as it does, a lawsuit to an abrupt termination, and thus depriving the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Reading Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Coyne v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Brown v. Beaver Valley Motor Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Gourlay Et Ux v. P.R.T. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Zanko v. SemmelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Hallbauer v. ZARFOSSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Walker v. PORT AUTH. OF ALLEGHENY CTY.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Morrell v. Lane Aviation Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Nieman v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API